Old printers just nagged.Dell E525w Driver & Software Suite for Windows (32bit/64bit) *OEM chips only since dynamic security clones can be killed at ANY TIME, so never update the firmware with 3rd party. Half a million pages gets expen$ive with color. I'll HAPPILY take a mono 4000 series with 200k and just brush it off and run it at 500k+ without a care, but the color machines just aren't machines you disregard the counter on unless it has serious issues. I didn't want to deal with a well used machine with 150k pages+a potentially tired fuser. I love the HPs for their mostly "don't cry about clone toner damage" policy*, but losing ColorSphere's consistency was a dealbreaker. Whatever HP has now has lessons from ColorSphere, but Canon Color V2 and Unison are the superior systems today. Dell just gave up badge engineering and just sells them as straight Lexmark and Xerox machines.Īs much as I loved HP ColorSphere back in the day, the dynamic security printers abandoned that level of CLJ color performance. "Dell Color" is Lexmark Unison too, by the way (unless it was a Xerox), but they both use Pantone colors so Unison vs Xerox has little matter. You're supposed to run the wiper every toner change with Brother.
The toner styles are also different (Lexmark=rounded, Brother=flat), as well as Brother having a corona wire that isn't considered "Maintenace free", which Lexmark does. For mono, it was 95% Lexmark/5% Brother again, Brother and Lexmark drums are very different.
Square-ish toner on the color series (usually on the right panel)=Lexmark, round toner=Xerox. I only somwewhat recently got to a point I could have a color laser and afford to own it and it took 3 rounds of failure to get one I like.Ĭheck a similar looking Lexmark Dell rebranded a lot of those. Unless someone has it in production and needs to do it anyway, it won't happen. Most people do not have CLJ's existing for exact reference photos. Look at the age of the question and answer.
0 kommentar(er)
